Dear Colleague, Full Screen Service ------------------- I should like to thank those of you who replied to my earlier letter and apologise for missing out the circulation list. I am enclosing both the list and a copy of all the replies that I have received to date with this letter. The situation in the UK Academic Community over the use of full screen services is as follows:- Networked terminals are in very common use in our community, in a number of universities the majority of terminals are handled on a network, usually based on an X.25 packet switching but also using Cambridge Rings and Ethernets. In all of these networks Triple X (or a similar community variant to cross multiple networks) is used and this obviously can impose a heavy load both on the network and on the host machines when single character remote echoing is used, particularly when screen editors are in use. A few years ago, it was decided to produce a new protocol that could be carried transparently over Triple X avoiding the need for single character remote echoing. This protocol has now been produced and published as SSMP - Simple Screen Management Protocol and a reference model in PASCAL has been produced for common micros while work is under way on a 'portable' host editor. Copies of the protocol are readily available from the Joint Network Team, Rutherford Appleton Lab., Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 OQX. I am also enclosing a brief article on SSMP that was published recently. There was obviously some discussion within our community as to whether it was appropriate to produce a new protocol at this stage while the work in ISO on VTP is under way. The justification for the production of a new protocol is still going to be a number of years before ISO produces an appropriate protocol, considering that the current draft of the VTP whose facilities, whilest going further than these offered by Triple X, does not match those which SSMP was designed to fill. I would be very pleased to have your comments on the above or on any of the points raised in the other letter. Yours sincerely, B. A. C. Gilmore