@make[report] @majorheading[Developments in Computing Technology] The following section indicates the assumptions made by the University in drawing up this document. It is of course subject to the normal hazards of forcasting changes in technology. @subheading[a) Processor & Storage] It is expected that chip advances will reduce the cost of processing power and main store over the period. Work stations are expected to get much cheaper; entry level micros will stay about current prices but have improvements in cpu speed and storage. The distinction between personal micro and work stations will disappear. Mainframe machines will also become cheaper under threat from both the 100 Mip personal machine and highly parallel machines like the computing surface. Main frames will have vector processors almost as a matter of course although proper exploration of these will involve the use of very complex (and expensive) compilers. @subheading[b) Backing Store] Rotating Discs and industry standard magnetic tapes seem likely to dominate backing storage for some years to come. Packing densities will increase providing for some reductions in cost per megabyte stored. As main storage expands disc storage will be seen more as file storage rather than paging capacity and larger capacities will be more important than fast access. The write once laser disc is now a viable storage medium although seek times and transfer rates are disappointing - nevertheless it might become the prime method of archive storage for valuable but seldom accessed data. The rewritable optical disc might appear during the period but performance and cost are not yet known. The CD Rom will become a method of volume distribution of read only data - and may become important for library and database work. Cassette tapes based on video recorder technology are an interesting possibility since they will combine large capacity and automatic loading. The transfer rate may be rather slow but they could enable a central operator to back up remote file stores - a service often requested by university departments. @subheading[c) Communications] Rapid technological developments will lead to considerable increases in transmission speed but there is little likelyhood of a fall in prices. The expanding demand, the labour intensive nature of wiring operations and the cosy monopilies of the PTTs all mitigate against a fall in costs. Universities might be able to use faster communications to reduce staff costs - but must otherwise resign themselves to paying more for this essential service. @subheading[d) Likely Effects of change on Industry] @paragraph[Large Multinationals] Large old established companies who have flourished on the basis of large orders for big machines will be seriously squeezed by competition from new agressive work station manufacturers. They will try to maintain their cash flow by providing expensive total solutions to firms' computing needs - bundles of workstation, mainframes and networking software. They will also raise charges for software and software maintenance substantially. This will be enforced by frequent new releases (to be purchased) with built in obsolescence. Products will not interwork with old versions of operation systems and other basics due to communications evolution. Each improved product will have a substantial price rise. @paragraph[Small Companies] There will continue to be intense competition in the PC and work station area - only the fittest will survive. Purchasers will multi- source large orders to decrease their vulnerability in the case of a supplier failing. Software companies are likely to prosper - the rising cost of manufacturers software will open opportunities and raise profit margins. As computer users perceive the disadvantages of being a capture consumer the sales of manufacturer independent packages will grow even if they are deficient in quality (cf UNIX). Networking specialists are also likely to prosper in the confused atmosphere that will persist until software standards are universal. @subheading[e) Effect of changes on UK Academic Community] It is clear that a lot more money is going to be spend acquiring and maintaining software in the next decade; it is not entirely clear where this money will come from. The Computer Board limits the amount of recurrent money that is made available for hardware and software support. It seems likely that most of this money will have to come onto the Universities' deminishing UGC grants. It is ironic that the Computer Board has succeeded in forcing universities off "private" operating systems just as the prime advantage of "free" system software and maintenance vanishes for ever. Universities that still have access to a "private" system may well wish to hold on to it until the software funding issue clarifies. There are many opportunities for universities to market software profitably. This has been regarded as rather infra-dig but protonged culs in funding are changing attitudes fast. Some further joint ventures - analogous to the Joint Network Team - may prove desirable. A joint software team might be able to purchase software on a country wide basis and provide substantial economies. It is even possible to envisage a joint operating system team to produce a hardware independent operating system for all universities! @flushright[Peter Stephens 12th February, 1988.]