@make[report] @device[x2700] @majorheading[Telematics] @section[General] Telematics offer a range of X.25 networking products called the Net 25 Product Family including concentrator switches, primary switches, backbone switches, PADs and supervisory nodes. The equipment is sold in the UK by Telematics and also by ICL and other companies including IAL who sell it under their own label. Telematics is certified for use on most public data networks. The maximum packet size supported is 1024 bytes. @section[Hardware Description] The Net 25 switches are based on a proprietary 32 bit bus that is stated to run at 32 Megabytes/sec. There are three models available, the P500, P1000 and P2000. The main difference being the number of slots available. The particular switch confgurations, described as Net 25/XXX are constructed from the appropriate model. The Net 25/100 switch consists of the bus and a general purpose M68000 processor card, a memory controller and memory, either a floppy or a hard disk, and an Network Communications Processor NCP. A Net 25/200 is formed by adding a 'communications accelerator' which is a two part cache, one part a cache for the general processor and the other part a cache for the NCP. The Net 25/400 is formed by the further addition of one or two extra general processors and the Net 25/800 by an additional two processors. At any stage (!) extra memory can be added up to a maximum of 16 Mb (?) in increments of 2 Mb(?) The NCP supports a TDM based bus with a scanner with a maximum capacity of 2 M bits/sec. The scanner can support up to 60 'line modules', each supporting up to 8 lines (depending on speed). In addition our new module in the field, although no BT approval as yet, with 120 Kbytes of on board RAM can support up to two expander cards to which either 8 V24 or 4 V35 cards can be supported @section[Software Description] The basic operating system, caled TRAX, is used to support a number of tasks which implement the switch software. In addition it is possible to run differnet complexities of Network Management tasks or 'user' written tasks. (A 'user' task is any not written by Telematics.) TRAX is written in M68000 assembler code. The switch software, consisting of a number of tasks to - handle call set up, handle data transfer and an Interface 6 Network Management (INF). The data transfer task is writtin in assembler and the call set up task is written in C. 'User' tasks can be written in either C, Pascal or assembler. @section[Configuration Options] The maximum number of line which can be supported by each model is as follows: @begin[verbatim] Net 25/100 ? Net 25/200 ? Net 25/400 ? Net 25/800 ? @end[verbatim] @section[Line Speeds/Interface Options] Telematics support 64 kb/s as well as the line speeds in the specification. V24 is used up to 19.2 kb/s and V35 above that. In addition X.21 is supported (at any speed?). Both internal and external clocking can be sent at any of these speeds. @section[Throughput] The following throughput is claimed for the Telematics range. The figures are for data packets only through the switch. There is no dependance of packet size. @begin[verbatim] Net 25/100 100 dpp/s Net 25/200 200 dpp/s Net 25/400 400 dpp/s Net 25/800 800 dpp/s @end[verbatim] ? section on proof of above. @section[Costs] The following costs have been quoted by Telematics for the 4 configurations. @begin[verbatim] 10 line: ? 18 line: ? 48 line: ? 100 line: ? @end[verbatim] The hardware quoted for the 10 line switch is about to be replaced by a new option and reference should be made to the ICL section for details of it. In addition to the above, various items can be added to the configuration - @begin[verbatim] Comms accelerator (to net 25/100) Extra processor (all) 10,500 Additional line cards (all) @end[verbatim] Any one of the configurations can be field upgraded to the large configuration. @section[Addressing] Telematics allows multiple entries in the address table. The table size is only limited by the overall store size. An individual entry can be either a single address or can be made to match and address, eg. 1234 would match any address from 12340000000 to 12349999999. This is not quite as flexible as a 'range of addresses' but by using multiple entries, the differences are fairly minor. @section[Network Management] Network Management can be performed on a separate machine or the software can be integrated with the software of one of the switches in a network. If it is integrated then there could be a performance cost although it is possible to run the management package at a priority level less than that of the switching functions on a separate processor with the switch system. No explicit charging is done by the current software though the information is present to do charging for calls, for example, to PSS. The management protocols are @u[not] in the public domain, although Telematics would sell us listings etc., to allow community hosts to perform some of the management. It appears that they would @u[not] allow other switch manufacturers to implement the protocols. @section[Statistics] Telematics meet the JNT spec except for the percentage utilisation ????? @section[Status Monitoring] Telematics do not report in real-time the number of active calls on a link or the respective address, otherwise the spec is met. @section[Control] It is @u[not] possible to clear a call to a selected address, the rest of the spec is met with the ability to change network addresses on a line link. It is possible to use any network terminal (password protected) for switch control. There are two levels of Network Management/Control Software - 'A' and 'C'. 'C' is a partial form that only allows the operation of a particular switch to control that switch. 'A' adds the ability to look at and control a remote switch. At lease one node in each university would require either the 'A' level or a support management machine. @section[Date/Time Stamp] Complies. @section[PSS Compatibility] Telematics say that they are currently compatible with PSS. However, if in the future (?) there is a divergance between PSS and CCITT then Telematics will guarantee compatibility only with CCITT. @section[Performance - Packet Transmission] @begin[verbatim] Call Request 30ms Data Packate 4-6ms Clear <30ms @section[Availability and Reliability] It was claimed that the Net 25 series would meet the reliability part of the specification. It was noted that line cards could be replaced on live systems, so that only a failure in a central module would force an entire operating system to go down. Redundant systems, ie line cards shared between two nodes could be constructed if necessary. Only figures for hardware reliability are stated - in terms of 7000 hours MTBF for the kernel system. An availability for an entire node is quoted at 99.9%. @section[Operations] It is not possible with the current software to automatically dump the store to backing disk in the case of a complete failure. If failures of individual tests occur details of the failure are printed out on the system console. There is not a separate handler for each link in a system and consequently it is not possible for an individual link to fail, and require a reload, that occurs on the GEC switches. @section[?????] All configurations, including the initial set up, is done by using the INF software. This can be achieved by either inputting commands that directly change the configuration or by editing a file and then 'executing' the file. In the case of the file, only the differences between the file and the running system are actioned. @section[X25 )1984)] Work is currently on hand to implement X25 (1984). Features will start to appear in early 1986 and there will be a comprehensive implementation (backing ?) by the end of 1986. The OSI copies document has not been studied. @section[Academic Community Special Requirements] The TRAX system together with the X25 system has been designed and built with the specific criteria that it is easy to add 'user' modules to the system to tailor it for non standard requirements. However, Telematics state that they have enough to do and would not wish to take on 'specials' for the academic community. They stated that various software houses could do specials but they were not prepared to take prime contractor status for the work. The advantages and disadvantages of the comments 'doing it itself' would need to be carefully weighed up. @section[Product History] @section[Company Information] @section[Confidentiality] @section[Summary]